Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Statements of key witnesses could not be relied upon where cross-examination was not permitted, especially in light of the High Court's direction that such statements would be unusable without cross-examination. The Tribunal also noted that the certificates of origin issued by the overseas authorities remained valid and had not been cancelled, so the Revenue's allegation that they were improper was unsupported. Following its earlier decision on identical facts, the Tribunal found no infirmity in dropping the proceedings and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Statements of key witnesses could not be relied upon where cross-examination was not permitted, especially in light of the High Court's direction that such statements would be unusable without cross-examination. The Tribunal also noted that the certificates of origin issued by the overseas authorities remained valid and had not been cancelled, so the Revenue's allegation that they were improper was unsupported. Following its earlier decision on identical facts, the Tribunal found no infirmity in dropping the proceedings and dismissed the Revenue's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
