Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Ex parte adjudication orders were set aside because the petitioner had not been given an effective opportunity to reply to the show cause notice. The HC accepted that the petitioner could place material before the authority, including the objection that two orders had been passed for the same tax period on the same ITC mismatch ground. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration from the stage of reply to the show cause notice, with all merits contentions left open, subject to payment of 10% of the tax demand under the specified annexures.
Ex parte adjudication orders were set aside because the petitioner had not been given an effective opportunity to reply to the show cause notice. The HC accepted that the petitioner could place material before the authority, including the objection that two orders had been passed for the same tax period on the same ITC mismatch ground. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration from the stage of reply to the show cause notice, with all merits contentions left open, subject to payment of 10% of the tax demand under the specified annexures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
