Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A credit co-operative society's interest income from deposits and investments with nationalised banks was held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because the funds were placed in the course of business to maintain liquidity and meet operational requirements. The ITAT applied co-ordinate Bench rulings on the same issue, found the principle squarely applicable on the facts, and noted that no binding contrary precedent was shown by the Revenue. The interest was treated as attributable to the assessee's business of providing credit facilities to members, so the disallowance was unsustainable and the deduction was allowed for the assessment years under appeal.
A credit co-operative society's interest income from deposits and investments with nationalised banks was held eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because the funds were placed in the course of business to maintain liquidity and meet operational requirements. The ITAT applied co-ordinate Bench rulings on the same issue, found the principle squarely applicable on the facts, and noted that no binding contrary precedent was shown by the Revenue. The interest was treated as attributable to the assessee's business of providing credit facilities to members, so the disallowance was unsustainable and the deduction was allowed for the assessment years under appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.