Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Cash expenditure was disallowed under section 40A(3) because the assessee failed to substantiate the claimed Rule 6DD exception with supporting ledger accounts or confirmation from the payee. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had dealt with the payee and that most payments were made in cash, so the case did not fall within the statutory exception. The disallowance was therefore upheld for the lead year and applied to the remaining assessment years, with all four appeals dismissed.
Cash expenditure was disallowed under section 40A(3) because the assessee failed to substantiate the claimed Rule 6DD exception with supporting ledger accounts or confirmation from the payee. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had dealt with the payee and that most payments were made in cash, so the case did not fall within the statutory exception. The disallowance was therefore upheld for the lead year and applied to the remaining assessment years, with all four appeals dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
