CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Non-upload of judicial orders prevented the appellant from being fairly bound to take fresh service steps, because the directions were not available to the Registry in time for compliance. Applying actus curiae neminem gravabit, the NCLAT held that a party cannot be prejudiced by delay attributable to the court process itself. The dismissal of the Section 7 petition for non-service was set aside, the petition was restored, and the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for disposal in accordance with law after hearing the parties.
Non-upload of judicial orders prevented the appellant from being fairly bound to take fresh service steps, because the directions were not available to the Registry in time for compliance. Applying actus curiae neminem gravabit, the NCLAT held that a party cannot be prejudiced by delay attributable to the court process itself. The dismissal of the Section 7 petition for non-service was set aside, the petition was restored, and the matter was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for disposal in accordance with law after hearing the parties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.