Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Bluetooth wireless headsets, headphones, earphones, earbuds and neck bands were held classifiable under CTI 8518 30 00, following the Tribunal's earlier decision on identical goods, and the claimed exemption was denied. The demand for the normal period was sustained on that classification. The extended period of limitation could not be invoked in this classification dispute, and the penalty under section 114A, being dependent on the same basis, was set aside. The matter was remitted only for segregation of the demand within the normal period and computation of interest on the confirmed demand.
Bluetooth wireless headsets, headphones, earphones, earbuds and neck bands were held classifiable under CTI 8518 30 00, following the Tribunal's earlier decision on identical goods, and the claimed exemption was denied. The demand for the normal period was sustained on that classification. The extended period of limitation could not be invoked in this classification dispute, and the penalty under section 114A, being dependent on the same basis, was set aside. The matter was remitted only for segregation of the demand within the normal period and computation of interest on the confirmed demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
