Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Pre-deposit defect under GST appeal law must be cured before dismissal where payment intention is shown
    Refund rejection on unutilised input tax credit remanded for fresh consideration after hearing in identical earlier case
    Parallel tax proceedings require the same liability and contravention; distinct GST infractions can proceed separately.
    Composite tax-period show cause notice under Section 74 quashed; separate financial years must be proceeded with year-wise.
    Unsigned GST assessment orders are invalid and unserved without DIN; fresh assessment may be made after proper notice and signature.
    Employee transportation cost recovery is not a taxable supply when treated as a welfare perquisite outside GST.
    Exempt electrical energy supply under rooftop solar arrangement does not require GST registration, subject to unchanged facts and law.
    Fluid coupling classification prevails over motor vehicle parts entry, with GST applied under Heading 8483.
    Outdoor catering as composite supply was classified under SAC 996334, attracting mandatory 5 per cent GST without input tax credit.
    Refund adjustment against disputed tax demand must follow prior intimation, and excess recovery beyond 20% needs special justification.
    Section 263 revision fails where enquiry was made, a possible view was taken, and Explanation 2 lacked notice.
    Natural justice barred rectification and refund adjustment without notice; recovery stayed pending expeditious disposal of appeal.
    Unregistered joint development arrangement did not trigger capital gains, as no transfer or real accrual arose in the relevant year.
    Refund claim against adjusted tax demand declined while appeal remained pending; liberty granted to seek refund after disposal.
    Limitation for reassessment notices under the new regime was exceeded, rendering the section 148 notice time-barred.
    Advance tax interest under section 234C cannot be levied before a newly set up business begins operations.
    Reassessment notice barred by limitation and defective approval, making the notice and reassessment void in law.
    Abated search assessments permit fresh claims; lease rentals, section 14A relief, and no notional ALV on unsold stock-in-trade.
    Recorded satisfaction in assessment order is mandatory before penalty under section 271D can be sustained.
    Exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) follows binding prior tribunal orders despite later administrative error
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Companies Law

      A sanctioned scheme of arrangement assigning specified...

      Sanctioned scheme of arrangement binds creditors and bars separate suits over claims assigned under the settlement framework.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Companies LawMay 13, 2026Case LawsAT
      A sanctioned scheme of arrangement assigning specified creditors' claims to the 63 Moons Group was held binding on all specified creditors, including dissenters, because the claims pursued in the civil suits arose from the same NSEL payment default and fell within the scheme. Once the settlement trigger event occurred, those claims, including claims against consenting brokers, stood assigned to the assignee, so the appellants could not continue independent civil proceedings for covered claims. The Tribunal also refused to revisit the scheme's legality, noting that earlier orders upholding it had already attained finality and were affirmed on merits by the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax