Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Section 95 insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors were held to be within limitation because the guarantors' debt liability had crystallised through the DRT judgment and recovery certificate, and the Covid-19 limitation extension plus later demand notice preserved a subsisting cause of action. The plea that approval of the corporate debtor's resolution plan extinguished the guarantors' liability was rejected, as personal guarantees were not dealt with in the plan and guarantor liability remains co-extensive for the unpaid balance. The Tribunal relied on the finality of the DRT adjudication and incomplete recovery, and upheld admission of the Section 95 applications.
Section 95 insolvency proceedings against personal guarantors were held to be within limitation because the guarantors' debt liability had crystallised through the DRT judgment and recovery certificate, and the Covid-19 limitation extension plus later demand notice preserved a subsisting cause of action. The plea that approval of the corporate debtor's resolution plan extinguished the guarantors' liability was rejected, as personal guarantees were not dealt with in the plan and guarantor liability remains co-extensive for the unpaid balance. The Tribunal relied on the finality of the DRT adjudication and incomplete recovery, and upheld admission of the Section 95 applications.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.