Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The NCLAT held that the insolvency framework empowers a resolution professional to appoint professionals when needed for the CIRP, and no CoC approval is required for appointing a transaction auditor or for filing an avoidance application; those objections were rejected. It also held that preferential transaction proceedings are summary in nature and do not require joinder of transferee entities where the corporate debtor's records suffice; the non-joinder plea therefore failed. On Section 43, the Tribunal found a preferential transfer only where the recipient was a creditor and the payment was within the related-party look-back period without material showing ordinary-course supply. The transfer to K. Sera Sera Digital Cinema Ltd. was upheld as preferential, while the transfer to K. Sera Sera Miniplex Ltd. was set aside.
The NCLAT held that the insolvency framework empowers a resolution professional to appoint professionals when needed for the CIRP, and no CoC approval is required for appointing a transaction auditor or for filing an avoidance application; those objections were rejected. It also held that preferential transaction proceedings are summary in nature and do not require joinder of transferee entities where the corporate debtor's records suffice; the non-joinder plea therefore failed. On Section 43, the Tribunal found a preferential transfer only where the recipient was a creditor and the payment was within the related-party look-back period without material showing ordinary-course supply. The transfer to K. Sera Sera Digital Cinema Ltd. was upheld as preferential, while the transfer to K. Sera Sera Miniplex Ltd. was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
