Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6361 to 6380 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT held that the insolvency framework empowers a resolution professional to appoint professionals when needed for the CIRP, and no CoC approval is required for appointing a transaction auditor or for filing an avoidance application; those objections were rejected. It also held that preferential transaction proceedings are summary in nature and do not require joinder of transferee entities where the corporate debtor's records suffice; the non-joinder plea therefore failed. On Section 43, the Tribunal found a preferential transfer only where the recipient was a creditor and the payment was within the related-party look-back period without material showing ordinary-course supply. The transfer to K. Sera Sera Digital Cinema Ltd. was upheld as preferential, while the transfer to K. Sera Sera Miniplex Ltd. was set aside.
The NCLAT held that the insolvency framework empowers a resolution professional to appoint professionals when needed for the CIRP, and no CoC approval is required for appointing a transaction auditor or for filing an avoidance application; those objections were rejected. It also held that preferential transaction proceedings are summary in nature and do not require joinder of transferee entities where the corporate debtor's records suffice; the non-joinder plea therefore failed. On Section 43, the Tribunal found a preferential transfer only where the recipient was a creditor and the payment was within the related-party look-back period without material showing ordinary-course supply. The transfer to K. Sera Sera Digital Cinema Ltd. was upheld as preferential, while the transfer to K. Sera Sera Miniplex Ltd. was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
