Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Pre-existing disputes over quality of goods, delivery delay and account reconciliation did not bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where the Corporate Debtor itself had prepared and communicated a consequences sheet quantifying those issues and crystallising the balance payable. The Tribunal treated the debtor's insistence that payment follow acceptance of that sheet as a conditional stance, not evidence of a subsisting dispute over the admitted amount. On the record, the balance debt was acknowledged, and the dispute was held to be hypothetical, spurious or illusory as to that crystallised liability. The appeal was dismissed and admission of the Corporate Debtor into CIRP under Section 9 was upheld.
Pre-existing disputes over quality of goods, delivery delay and account reconciliation did not bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where the Corporate Debtor itself had prepared and communicated a consequences sheet quantifying those issues and crystallising the balance payable. The Tribunal treated the debtor's insistence that payment follow acceptance of that sheet as a conditional stance, not evidence of a subsisting dispute over the admitted amount. On the record, the balance debt was acknowledged, and the dispute was held to be hypothetical, spurious or illusory as to that crystallised liability. The appeal was dismissed and admission of the Corporate Debtor into CIRP under Section 9 was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
