Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Simultaneous insolvency proceedings against a principal borrower and its corporate guarantor were held maintainable, so a status quo order in the borrower's case did not bar liquidation of the guarantor. A proposed settlement could not be used to resist liquidation after commencement of liquidation, because withdrawal under Section 12A is unavailable at that stage; any post-liquidation compromise must proceed through a Section 230 scheme. The tribunal also found no error in deciding an interlocutory application on merits despite the applicant's absence, as the rules permit dismissal for default or decision on merits. Liquidation was sustained on the unanimous CoC decision, absence of any resolution plan, and failure of settlement efforts.
Simultaneous insolvency proceedings against a principal borrower and its corporate guarantor were held maintainable, so a status quo order in the borrower's case did not bar liquidation of the guarantor. A proposed settlement could not be used to resist liquidation after commencement of liquidation, because withdrawal under Section 12A is unavailable at that stage; any post-liquidation compromise must proceed through a Section 230 scheme. The tribunal also found no error in deciding an interlocutory application on merits despite the applicant's absence, as the rules permit dismissal for default or decision on merits. Liquidation was sustained on the unanimous CoC decision, absence of any resolution plan, and failure of settlement efforts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
