Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An approved resolution plan under the IBC extinguished all pre-CIRP income-tax dues, including assessed and unassessed claims, and terminated pending assessment or appellate proceedings for the relevant period. Applying the clean slate principle and Supreme Court authority, the HC held that claims not included in the resolution plan could not survive after approval under section 31. Because the reassessment related to a pre-approval assessment year, the subsequent reassessment order and demand notice had no legal basis and were quashed; the merits of the assessment were treated as academic.
An approved resolution plan under the IBC extinguished all pre-CIRP income-tax dues, including assessed and unassessed claims, and terminated pending assessment or appellate proceedings for the relevant period. Applying the clean slate principle and Supreme Court authority, the HC held that claims not included in the resolution plan could not survive after approval under section 31. Because the reassessment related to a pre-approval assessment year, the subsequent reassessment order and demand notice had no legal basis and were quashed; the merits of the assessment were treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.