Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An approved resolution plan under the IBC extinguished all pre-CIRP income-tax dues, including assessed and unassessed claims, and terminated pending assessment or appellate proceedings for the relevant period. Applying the clean slate principle and Supreme Court authority, the HC held that claims not included in the resolution plan could not survive after approval under section 31. Because the reassessment related to a pre-approval assessment year, the subsequent reassessment order and demand notice had no legal basis and were quashed; the merits of the assessment were treated as academic.
An approved resolution plan under the IBC extinguished all pre-CIRP income-tax dues, including assessed and unassessed claims, and terminated pending assessment or appellate proceedings for the relevant period. Applying the clean slate principle and Supreme Court authority, the HC held that claims not included in the resolution plan could not survive after approval under section 31. Because the reassessment related to a pre-approval assessment year, the subsequent reassessment order and demand notice had no legal basis and were quashed; the merits of the assessment were treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
