Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
An approved resolution plan under the IBC extinguished all pre-CIRP income-tax dues, including assessed and unassessed claims, and terminated pending assessment or appellate proceedings for the relevant period. Applying the clean slate principle and Supreme Court authority, the HC held that claims not included in the resolution plan could not survive after approval under section 31. Because the reassessment related to a pre-approval assessment year, the subsequent reassessment order and demand notice had no legal basis and were quashed; the merits of the assessment were treated as academic.
An approved resolution plan under the IBC extinguished all pre-CIRP income-tax dues, including assessed and unassessed claims, and terminated pending assessment or appellate proceedings for the relevant period. Applying the clean slate principle and Supreme Court authority, the HC held that claims not included in the resolution plan could not survive after approval under section 31. Because the reassessment related to a pre-approval assessment year, the subsequent reassessment order and demand notice had no legal basis and were quashed; the merits of the assessment were treated as academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.