Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Uncorroborated retracted search statements, third-party tally data and WhatsApp material were found insufficient to sustain alleged commission additions in the individual assessee's case, because there was no cash trail, bank entry or independent documentary proof of receipt; the additions were deleted. Reassessment notices issued beyond three years were held invalid where section 149(1)(b) was not satisfied, as the alleged escapement did not meet the Rs. 50 lakh threshold; the reassessment proceedings were quashed. In the company's case, alleged cash-sales and commission-expenditure issues were remanded for fresh adjudication because factual verification and 65B compliance were required.
Uncorroborated retracted search statements, third-party tally data and WhatsApp material were found insufficient to sustain alleged commission additions in the individual assessee's case, because there was no cash trail, bank entry or independent documentary proof of receipt; the additions were deleted. Reassessment notices issued beyond three years were held invalid where section 149(1)(b) was not satisfied, as the alleged escapement did not meet the Rs. 50 lakh threshold; the reassessment proceedings were quashed. In the company's case, alleged cash-sales and commission-expenditure issues were remanded for fresh adjudication because factual verification and 65B compliance were required.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
