Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
An appellate authority can entertain an alternate deduction claim even without a revised return where the claim is not a fresh item but a request to allow the same interest expenditure under the correct head, and the issue can be examined on existing material. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's objection based on non-filing of a revised return and upheld admission of the claim in appeal. It also held that interest on borrowed funds remained deductible as business expenditure because the loan had been used for business and that factual finding was not displaced. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the Revenue's appeals failed.
An appellate authority can entertain an alternate deduction claim even without a revised return where the claim is not a fresh item but a request to allow the same interest expenditure under the correct head, and the issue can be examined on existing material. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's objection based on non-filing of a revised return and upheld admission of the claim in appeal. It also held that interest on borrowed funds remained deductible as business expenditure because the loan had been used for business and that factual finding was not displaced. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
