Restriction of Input Tax Credit under Rule 86A applies only to fraudulently or ineligible availed credit; mere wrongful recipient availment is insuffi...
An appellate authority can entertain an alternate deduction claim even without a revised return where the claim is not a fresh item but a request to allow the same interest expenditure under the correct head, and the issue can be examined on existing material. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's objection based on non-filing of a revised return and upheld admission of the claim in appeal. It also held that interest on borrowed funds remained deductible as business expenditure because the loan had been used for business and that factual finding was not displaced. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the Revenue's appeals failed.
An appellate authority can entertain an alternate deduction claim even without a revised return where the claim is not a fresh item but a request to allow the same interest expenditure under the correct head, and the issue can be examined on existing material. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's objection based on non-filing of a revised return and upheld admission of the claim in appeal. It also held that interest on borrowed funds remained deductible as business expenditure because the loan had been used for business and that factual finding was not displaced. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
