Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
An appellate authority can entertain an alternate deduction claim even without a revised return where the claim is not a fresh item but a request to allow the same interest expenditure under the correct head, and the issue can be examined on existing material. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's objection based on non-filing of a revised return and upheld admission of the claim in appeal. It also held that interest on borrowed funds remained deductible as business expenditure because the loan had been used for business and that factual finding was not displaced. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the Revenue's appeals failed.
An appellate authority can entertain an alternate deduction claim even without a revised return where the claim is not a fresh item but a request to allow the same interest expenditure under the correct head, and the issue can be examined on existing material. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's objection based on non-filing of a revised return and upheld admission of the claim in appeal. It also held that interest on borrowed funds remained deductible as business expenditure because the loan had been used for business and that factual finding was not displaced. The disallowance was therefore unsustainable and the Revenue's appeals failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
