Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The Tribunal deleted the transfer pricing adjustment on corporate guarantee fee, holding that 0.25% was already accepted in the assessee's own earlier years and the higher rate was unsupported. It also deleted the adjustment on software cost allocation, rejecting re-characterisation of a cost-to-cost transaction as intra-group services. For electricity transfer pricing, it held that SEB rates were the proper benchmark and remanded the matter for verification and fresh determination. The duplicate disallowance under section 80-IA was held unsustainable, and the section 14A disallowance was deleted because no exempt income was earned. The section 115JB adjustment on education cess and interest under section 234A were both remanded for fresh verification.
The Tribunal deleted the transfer pricing adjustment on corporate guarantee fee, holding that 0.25% was already accepted in the assessee's own earlier years and the higher rate was unsupported. It also deleted the adjustment on software cost allocation, rejecting re-characterisation of a cost-to-cost transaction as intra-group services. For electricity transfer pricing, it held that SEB rates were the proper benchmark and remanded the matter for verification and fresh determination. The duplicate disallowance under section 80-IA was held unsustainable, and the section 14A disallowance was deleted because no exempt income was earned. The section 115JB adjustment on education cess and interest under section 234A were both remanded for fresh verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
