Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
The Tribunal deleted the transfer pricing adjustment on corporate guarantee fee, holding that 0.25% was already accepted in the assessee's own earlier years and the higher rate was unsupported. It also deleted the adjustment on software cost allocation, rejecting re-characterisation of a cost-to-cost transaction as intra-group services. For electricity transfer pricing, it held that SEB rates were the proper benchmark and remanded the matter for verification and fresh determination. The duplicate disallowance under section 80-IA was held unsustainable, and the section 14A disallowance was deleted because no exempt income was earned. The section 115JB adjustment on education cess and interest under section 234A were both remanded for fresh verification.
The Tribunal deleted the transfer pricing adjustment on corporate guarantee fee, holding that 0.25% was already accepted in the assessee's own earlier years and the higher rate was unsupported. It also deleted the adjustment on software cost allocation, rejecting re-characterisation of a cost-to-cost transaction as intra-group services. For electricity transfer pricing, it held that SEB rates were the proper benchmark and remanded the matter for verification and fresh determination. The duplicate disallowance under section 80-IA was held unsustainable, and the section 14A disallowance was deleted because no exempt income was earned. The section 115JB adjustment on education cess and interest under section 234A were both remanded for fresh verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
