Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Supply of Coursera user licences was held not to be an education service because the applicant only granted access to proprietary digital content and did not impart education, provide faculty, control curriculum, or assume instructional responsibility. Applying the specific-description principle, the supply was classified as a licensing service under Heading 9973, specifically SAC 997331, rather than Heading 9992 or Heading 9984. Because the supply was not an education service, the exemption under Sl. No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was held inapplicable.
Supply of Coursera user licences was held not to be an education service because the applicant only granted access to proprietary digital content and did not impart education, provide faculty, control curriculum, or assume instructional responsibility. Applying the specific-description principle, the supply was classified as a licensing service under Heading 9973, specifically SAC 997331, rather than Heading 9992 or Heading 9984. Because the supply was not an education service, the exemption under Sl. No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was held inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.