Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Supply of Coursera user licences was held not to be an education service because the applicant only granted access to proprietary digital content and did not impart education, provide faculty, control curriculum, or assume instructional responsibility. Applying the specific-description principle, the supply was classified as a licensing service under Heading 9973, specifically SAC 997331, rather than Heading 9992 or Heading 9984. Because the supply was not an education service, the exemption under Sl. No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was held inapplicable.
Supply of Coursera user licences was held not to be an education service because the applicant only granted access to proprietary digital content and did not impart education, provide faculty, control curriculum, or assume instructional responsibility. Applying the specific-description principle, the supply was classified as a licensing service under Heading 9973, specifically SAC 997331, rather than Heading 9992 or Heading 9984. Because the supply was not an education service, the exemption under Sl. No. 72 of Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was held inapplicable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
