Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
In transfer pricing benchmarking for captive software support and ITES services, companies with significant intangibles, brand value, patents, R&D functions, product-based operations, diversified activities or extraordinary events were found functionally dissimilar and excluded as comparables. Infosys Technologies Ltd., Wipro Ltd., Kals Information Systems Ltd., Celestial Labs Ltd., Avani Cimcon Technologies Ltd., E-Zest Solutions Ltd., Mold-Tek Technologies Ltd., Accentia Technologies Ltd., Eclerx Services Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., HCL Comnet System & Services Ltd., Acropetal Technologies Ltd., Genesys International Corporation Ltd. and Datamatics Financial Services Ltd. were excluded. Tata Elxsi Ltd. and Persistent Systems Private Ltd. were remitted for fresh consideration because no specific examination had been made. Coral Hub Ltd. remained included as the objection was not pressed.
In transfer pricing benchmarking for captive software support and ITES services, companies with significant intangibles, brand value, patents, R&D functions, product-based operations, diversified activities or extraordinary events were found functionally dissimilar and excluded as comparables. Infosys Technologies Ltd., Wipro Ltd., Kals Information Systems Ltd., Celestial Labs Ltd., Avani Cimcon Technologies Ltd., E-Zest Solutions Ltd., Mold-Tek Technologies Ltd., Accentia Technologies Ltd., Eclerx Services Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., HCL Comnet System & Services Ltd., Acropetal Technologies Ltd., Genesys International Corporation Ltd. and Datamatics Financial Services Ltd. were excluded. Tata Elxsi Ltd. and Persistent Systems Private Ltd. were remitted for fresh consideration because no specific examination had been made. Coral Hub Ltd. remained included as the objection was not pressed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.