Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Enhancement of short-term capital gains based on a departmental valuation failed because the Valuation Officer did not serve the statutory notice or afford the assessee an opportunity to object to the proposed fair market value. The Tribunal treated this as a procedural defect and denial of natural justice, so the valuation report could not be acted upon. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after obtaining a fresh valuation report in accordance with law, and the appellate order on this point was set aside.
Enhancement of short-term capital gains based on a departmental valuation failed because the Valuation Officer did not serve the statutory notice or afford the assessee an opportunity to object to the proposed fair market value. The Tribunal treated this as a procedural defect and denial of natural justice, so the valuation report could not be acted upon. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after obtaining a fresh valuation report in accordance with law, and the appellate order on this point was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.