Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The ITAT recalled its earlier order because it had decided an issue not arising from the Revenue's appeal, creating an apparent factual error. On rehearing, it held that unpaid service tax liability was not disallowable under section 43B where the assessee had not claimed any deduction and the amount had not been debited to the profit and loss account. Following the co-ordinate Bench ruling for another year, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's challenge and dismissed the appeal.
The ITAT recalled its earlier order because it had decided an issue not arising from the Revenue's appeal, creating an apparent factual error. On rehearing, it held that unpaid service tax liability was not disallowable under section 43B where the assessee had not claimed any deduction and the amount had not been debited to the profit and loss account. Following the co-ordinate Bench ruling for another year, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue's challenge and dismissed the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
