Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
DSIR certification supported deduction under section 35(2AB) because the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and held that the Assessing Officer could not disregard the certified R&D expenditure without following the statutory procedure. It also sustained deletion of manufacturing-expense and R&D additions made on post-survey extrapolation, finding no abnormality in the expense ratio and no rebuttal of the factual findings. As those disallowances failed on merits, the reassessment based on the same grounds was held invalid. For the later year, interest disallowance linked to a loan treated as unexplained cash credit was deleted once that underlying addition no longer survived, while other claims were sent back for factual verification.
DSIR certification supported deduction under section 35(2AB) because the Tribunal applied judicial consistency and held that the Assessing Officer could not disregard the certified R&D expenditure without following the statutory procedure. It also sustained deletion of manufacturing-expense and R&D additions made on post-survey extrapolation, finding no abnormality in the expense ratio and no rebuttal of the factual findings. As those disallowances failed on merits, the reassessment based on the same grounds was held invalid. For the later year, interest disallowance linked to a loan treated as unexplained cash credit was deleted once that underlying addition no longer survived, while other claims were sent back for factual verification.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.