Genuineness of investment evidence determines LTCG entitlement; non specific regulatory reports cannot displace transaction specific documentary proof...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5881 to 5900 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A delayed duplicate TDS re-deposit was treated as a real revenue loss because the second payment, though made under mistake, was beyond time and the payee had already availed credit; the levy of interest was therefore sustained. By contrast, where the assessee had already deposited TDS and filed Form 26QB within time, the later filing was only a mistaken duplication and not an original default in furnishing the statement; late fee under section 234E was therefore deleted. The appeal was partly allowed.
A delayed duplicate TDS re-deposit was treated as a real revenue loss because the second payment, though made under mistake, was beyond time and the payee had already availed credit; the levy of interest was therefore sustained. By contrast, where the assessee had already deposited TDS and filed Form 26QB within time, the later filing was only a mistaken duplication and not an original default in furnishing the statement; late fee under section 234E was therefore deleted. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
