Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
A delayed duplicate TDS re-deposit was treated as a real revenue loss because the second payment, though made under mistake, was beyond time and the payee had already availed credit; the levy of interest was therefore sustained. By contrast, where the assessee had already deposited TDS and filed Form 26QB within time, the later filing was only a mistaken duplication and not an original default in furnishing the statement; late fee under section 234E was therefore deleted. The appeal was partly allowed.
A delayed duplicate TDS re-deposit was treated as a real revenue loss because the second payment, though made under mistake, was beyond time and the payee had already availed credit; the levy of interest was therefore sustained. By contrast, where the assessee had already deposited TDS and filed Form 26QB within time, the later filing was only a mistaken duplication and not an original default in furnishing the statement; late fee under section 234E was therefore deleted. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
