Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
The reassessment procedure under section 148 was held invalid where the assessee was not supplied the adverse material relied upon for the section 148A(b) notice and the order under section 148A(d) did not deal with the factual objections raised in reply. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had sought the material said to connect it with accommodation entries, yet only a general narration was furnished and the reply was not meaningfully considered. Because the statutory pre-notice process was not properly followed, the assumption of jurisdiction under section 148 was vitiated. The notice under section 148, the section 148A(d) order, and the reassessment were quashed.
The reassessment procedure under section 148 was held invalid where the assessee was not supplied the adverse material relied upon for the section 148A(b) notice and the order under section 148A(d) did not deal with the factual objections raised in reply. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had sought the material said to connect it with accommodation entries, yet only a general narration was furnished and the reply was not meaningfully considered. Because the statutory pre-notice process was not properly followed, the assumption of jurisdiction under section 148 was vitiated. The notice under section 148, the section 148A(d) order, and the reassessment were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
