Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The reassessment procedure under section 148 was held invalid where the assessee was not supplied the adverse material relied upon for the section 148A(b) notice and the order under section 148A(d) did not deal with the factual objections raised in reply. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had sought the material said to connect it with accommodation entries, yet only a general narration was furnished and the reply was not meaningfully considered. Because the statutory pre-notice process was not properly followed, the assumption of jurisdiction under section 148 was vitiated. The notice under section 148, the section 148A(d) order, and the reassessment were quashed.
The reassessment procedure under section 148 was held invalid where the assessee was not supplied the adverse material relied upon for the section 148A(b) notice and the order under section 148A(d) did not deal with the factual objections raised in reply. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had sought the material said to connect it with accommodation entries, yet only a general narration was furnished and the reply was not meaningfully considered. Because the statutory pre-notice process was not properly followed, the assumption of jurisdiction under section 148 was vitiated. The notice under section 148, the section 148A(d) order, and the reassessment were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
