Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
For notified goods such as gold, seizure on reasonable belief initially shifts the burden to the person concerned to prove lawful acquisition under Section 123. The appellate authority's absolute release of the seized gold was unsustainable because it accepted books, invoices and GST records without correlating the entries or addressing discrepancies and the admitted fabrication of invoices and stock records. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh examination of the documentary evidence and the Revenue's grounds. The limitation objection to the show-cause notice was rejected, as the notice was covered by the statutory extension under the relaxation law and the objection had not been raised below.
For notified goods such as gold, seizure on reasonable belief initially shifts the burden to the person concerned to prove lawful acquisition under Section 123. The appellate authority's absolute release of the seized gold was unsustainable because it accepted books, invoices and GST records without correlating the entries or addressing discrepancies and the admitted fabrication of invoices and stock records. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh examination of the documentary evidence and the Revenue's grounds. The limitation objection to the show-cause notice was rejected, as the notice was covered by the statutory extension under the relaxation law and the objection had not been raised below.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
