Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A personal guarantor's Section 94 application, filed after an e-auction had been held and confirmed under SARFAESI, was found to be a non-bona fide attempt to delay recovery rather than a genuine insolvency resolution step. The Tribunal held that the filing was an abuse of process because the bank had already enforced its security rights and the guarantor had also pursued a separate challenge before the DRT, which was the appropriate remedy. The rejection of the applications was therefore upheld, and the appellant was left to continue contesting the auction before the DRT.
A personal guarantor's Section 94 application, filed after an e-auction had been held and confirmed under SARFAESI, was found to be a non-bona fide attempt to delay recovery rather than a genuine insolvency resolution step. The Tribunal held that the filing was an abuse of process because the bank had already enforced its security rights and the guarantor had also pursued a separate challenge before the DRT, which was the appropriate remedy. The rejection of the applications was therefore upheld, and the appellant was left to continue contesting the auction before the DRT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
