Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A personal guarantor's Section 94 application, filed after an e-auction had been held and confirmed under SARFAESI, was found to be a non-bona fide attempt to delay recovery rather than a genuine insolvency resolution step. The Tribunal held that the filing was an abuse of process because the bank had already enforced its security rights and the guarantor had also pursued a separate challenge before the DRT, which was the appropriate remedy. The rejection of the applications was therefore upheld, and the appellant was left to continue contesting the auction before the DRT.
A personal guarantor's Section 94 application, filed after an e-auction had been held and confirmed under SARFAESI, was found to be a non-bona fide attempt to delay recovery rather than a genuine insolvency resolution step. The Tribunal held that the filing was an abuse of process because the bank had already enforced its security rights and the guarantor had also pursued a separate challenge before the DRT, which was the appropriate remedy. The rejection of the applications was therefore upheld, and the appellant was left to continue contesting the auction before the DRT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
