Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provisional attachment under PMLA can extend to any person found in possession of proceeds of crime, even if that person is not named in the FIR or charge-sheet for the scheduled offence. The Tribunal also found that the NBFC-fintech lending model involved outsourcing of core lending, onboarding, disbursement, recovery and monitoring functions to service providers in a manner inconsistent with the RBI outsourcing framework, while the apps imposed upfront charges and coercive recovery practices. On those facts, the profits were prima facie linked to cheating, extortion and unlawful recovery, so the confirmed attachment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Provisional attachment under PMLA can extend to any person found in possession of proceeds of crime, even if that person is not named in the FIR or charge-sheet for the scheduled offence. The Tribunal also found that the NBFC-fintech lending model involved outsourcing of core lending, onboarding, disbursement, recovery and monitoring functions to service providers in a manner inconsistent with the RBI outsourcing framework, while the apps imposed upfront charges and coercive recovery practices. On those facts, the profits were prima facie linked to cheating, extortion and unlawful recovery, so the confirmed attachment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.