Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Provisional attachment under PMLA can extend to any person found in possession of proceeds of crime, even if that person is not named in the FIR or charge-sheet for the scheduled offence. The Tribunal also found that the NBFC-fintech lending model involved outsourcing of core lending, onboarding, disbursement, recovery and monitoring functions to service providers in a manner inconsistent with the RBI outsourcing framework, while the apps imposed upfront charges and coercive recovery practices. On those facts, the profits were prima facie linked to cheating, extortion and unlawful recovery, so the confirmed attachment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Provisional attachment under PMLA can extend to any person found in possession of proceeds of crime, even if that person is not named in the FIR or charge-sheet for the scheduled offence. The Tribunal also found that the NBFC-fintech lending model involved outsourcing of core lending, onboarding, disbursement, recovery and monitoring functions to service providers in a manner inconsistent with the RBI outsourcing framework, while the apps imposed upfront charges and coercive recovery practices. On those facts, the profits were prima facie linked to cheating, extortion and unlawful recovery, so the confirmed attachment was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
