Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1341 to 1360 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Indian entity's education consultancy, marketing and recruitment support for foreign universities was held to be export of services, not intermediary service under the IGST Act. The decisive test was whether the contractual recipient and payer were the foreign universities and whether the supplier acted on its own account. Because the entity contracted with the universities, invoiced them, received consideration from them, did not charge students, had no authority to bind the universities, and could not guarantee admissions, incidental assistance to students in India did not convert it into an intermediary. The refund rejection was set aside and the refund was directed to be processed with statutory interest.
Indian entity's education consultancy, marketing and recruitment support for foreign universities was held to be export of services, not intermediary service under the IGST Act. The decisive test was whether the contractual recipient and payer were the foreign universities and whether the supplier acted on its own account. Because the entity contracted with the universities, invoiced them, received consideration from them, did not charge students, had no authority to bind the universities, and could not guarantee admissions, incidental assistance to students in India did not convert it into an intermediary. The refund rejection was set aside and the refund was directed to be processed with statutory interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.