Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court set aside the order rejecting revocation of cancellation of registration after finding that the petitioner should be given an adequate opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice in the revocation proceedings. It did not decide whether the original time granted by the authority was sufficient on merits; instead, it applied natural justice and directed that the petitioner be allowed to file objections within the time fixed by the Court. The authority was then required to consider those objections and pass a fresh order.
The High Court set aside the order rejecting revocation of cancellation of registration after finding that the petitioner should be given an adequate opportunity to respond to the show-cause notice in the revocation proceedings. It did not decide whether the original time granted by the authority was sufficient on merits; instead, it applied natural justice and directed that the petitioner be allowed to file objections within the time fixed by the Court. The authority was then required to consider those objections and pass a fresh order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.