Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not survive once the underlying quantum addition, which formed the sole basis of the penalty, had already been deleted in the assessee's own case and that fact was not disputed by the Revenue. The Tribunal treated the penalty as purely consequential to the assessment addition and held that, without a surviving addition, there was no basis to sustain the penalty. The order sustaining the penalty was set aside and the penalty deleted.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not survive once the underlying quantum addition, which formed the sole basis of the penalty, had already been deleted in the assessee's own case and that fact was not disputed by the Revenue. The Tribunal treated the penalty as purely consequential to the assessment addition and held that, without a surviving addition, there was no basis to sustain the penalty. The order sustaining the penalty was set aside and the penalty deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
