Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4813
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96257 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Royalty and sponsorship receipts received by a sports federation were held to be incidental to its charitable objects and not indicative of any business activity or profit motive. As the facts for the year matched the assessee's earlier case, the Tribunal followed that precedent and held that the proviso to section 2(15) did not apply. Exemption under sections 11 and 12 was therefore sustained, the Revenue's challenge failed, and the assessee's cross-objection was dismissed as infructuous.
Royalty and sponsorship receipts received by a sports federation were held to be incidental to its charitable objects and not indicative of any business activity or profit motive. As the facts for the year matched the assessee's earlier case, the Tribunal followed that precedent and held that the proviso to section 2(15) did not apply. Exemption under sections 11 and 12 was therefore sustained, the Revenue's challenge failed, and the assessee's cross-objection was dismissed as infructuous.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.