Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A securitisation trust under the SARFAESI and RBI framework was treated as a revocable trust where the deed allowed re-transfer of the trust fund and re-assumption of control by Security Receipt Holders; the trust income was therefore assessed in the hands of the beneficiaries and not the trust itself. The Tribunal also held that such a statutorily structured trust was not an Association of Persons, since the beneficiaries were identifiable and their shares were determinable from the governing documents and contribution records. On that basis, the attempt to tax the trust as an indeterminate entity failed and the additions made on that footing were deleted.
A securitisation trust under the SARFAESI and RBI framework was treated as a revocable trust where the deed allowed re-transfer of the trust fund and re-assumption of control by Security Receipt Holders; the trust income was therefore assessed in the hands of the beneficiaries and not the trust itself. The Tribunal also held that such a statutorily structured trust was not an Association of Persons, since the beneficiaries were identifiable and their shares were determinable from the governing documents and contribution records. On that basis, the attempt to tax the trust as an indeterminate entity failed and the additions made on that footing were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
