Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The High Court quashed the order denying input tax credit and the consequential garnishee proceedings because the authority had not considered the later amendment to section 16, which extended the time-limit for availing input tax credit for specified years, or the CBIC clarification on its implementation. Following the approach adopted in earlier matters, the Court held that these subsequent legal developments had to be examined before a fresh decision could be made. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Authority for reconsideration in accordance with law, while the refund claim and all other contentions were left open.
The High Court quashed the order denying input tax credit and the consequential garnishee proceedings because the authority had not considered the later amendment to section 16, which extended the time-limit for availing input tax credit for specified years, or the CBIC clarification on its implementation. Following the approach adopted in earlier matters, the Court held that these subsequent legal developments had to be examined before a fresh decision could be made. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Authority for reconsideration in accordance with law, while the refund claim and all other contentions were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
