Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
The High Court quashed the order denying input tax credit and the consequential garnishee proceedings because the authority had not considered the later amendment to section 16, which extended the time-limit for availing input tax credit for specified years, or the CBIC clarification on its implementation. Following the approach adopted in earlier matters, the Court held that these subsequent legal developments had to be examined before a fresh decision could be made. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Authority for reconsideration in accordance with law, while the refund claim and all other contentions were left open.
The High Court quashed the order denying input tax credit and the consequential garnishee proceedings because the authority had not considered the later amendment to section 16, which extended the time-limit for availing input tax credit for specified years, or the CBIC clarification on its implementation. Following the approach adopted in earlier matters, the Court held that these subsequent legal developments had to be examined before a fresh decision could be made. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Authority for reconsideration in accordance with law, while the refund claim and all other contentions were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
