Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Where identical invoice-related errors were involved, the Court held that benefit under GST Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST could not be denied merely because the circular referred to earlier years, and it could be extended to financial year 2019-20. It further noted that Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST expressly covered the petitioner's relevant period. On that basis, the adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law and the circulars.
Where identical invoice-related errors were involved, the Court held that benefit under GST Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST could not be denied merely because the circular referred to earlier years, and it could be extended to financial year 2019-20. It further noted that Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST expressly covered the petitioner's relevant period. On that basis, the adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law and the circulars.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.