Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Where identical invoice-related errors were involved, the Court held that benefit under GST Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST could not be denied merely because the circular referred to earlier years, and it could be extended to financial year 2019-20. It further noted that Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST expressly covered the petitioner's relevant period. On that basis, the adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law and the circulars.
Where identical invoice-related errors were involved, the Court held that benefit under GST Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST could not be denied merely because the circular referred to earlier years, and it could be extended to financial year 2019-20. It further noted that Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST expressly covered the petitioner's relevant period. On that basis, the adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law and the circulars.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
