Jurisdictional validity: notice issued by a non jurisdictional officer invalidates reassessment where no formal transfer or independent verification o...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where identical invoice-related errors were involved, the Court held that benefit under GST Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST could not be denied merely because the circular referred to earlier years, and it could be extended to financial year 2019-20. It further noted that Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST expressly covered the petitioner's relevant period. On that basis, the adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law and the circulars.
Where identical invoice-related errors were involved, the Court held that benefit under GST Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST could not be denied merely because the circular referred to earlier years, and it could be extended to financial year 2019-20. It further noted that Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST expressly covered the petitioner's relevant period. On that basis, the adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law and the circulars.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.