Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where identical invoice-related errors were involved, the Court held that benefit under GST Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST could not be denied merely because the circular referred to earlier years, and it could be extended to financial year 2019-20. It further noted that Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST expressly covered the petitioner's relevant period. On that basis, the adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law and the circulars.
Where identical invoice-related errors were involved, the Court held that benefit under GST Circular No. 183/15/2022-GST could not be denied merely because the circular referred to earlier years, and it could be extended to financial year 2019-20. It further noted that Circular No. 193/05/2023-GST expressly covered the petitioner's relevant period. On that basis, the adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with law and the circulars.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.