Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Section 143(1)(a) intimation lost its independent existence after the Assessing Officer reconsidered the same adjustments in scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) and granted relief on the rectification request. Applying the merger principle, the Tribunal held that the appeal against the intimation had become infructuous, and once that appeal was infructuous, the Revenue's further appeal against the first appellate order in the same matter was also infructuous. The Revenue's appeal was therefore dismissed on that basis.
Section 143(1)(a) intimation lost its independent existence after the Assessing Officer reconsidered the same adjustments in scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) and granted relief on the rectification request. Applying the merger principle, the Tribunal held that the appeal against the intimation had become infructuous, and once that appeal was infructuous, the Revenue's further appeal against the first appellate order in the same matter was also infructuous. The Revenue's appeal was therefore dismissed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.