Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5001 to 5020 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 143(1)(a) intimation lost its independent existence after the Assessing Officer reconsidered the same adjustments in scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) and granted relief on the rectification request. Applying the merger principle, the Tribunal held that the appeal against the intimation had become infructuous, and once that appeal was infructuous, the Revenue's further appeal against the first appellate order in the same matter was also infructuous. The Revenue's appeal was therefore dismissed on that basis.
Section 143(1)(a) intimation lost its independent existence after the Assessing Officer reconsidered the same adjustments in scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) and granted relief on the rectification request. Applying the merger principle, the Tribunal held that the appeal against the intimation had become infructuous, and once that appeal was infructuous, the Revenue's further appeal against the first appellate order in the same matter was also infructuous. The Revenue's appeal was therefore dismissed on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.