Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Consultancy charges paid to a sister concern were treated as genuine business expenditure because the agreements defined the work, supporting bills were on record, TDS and service tax had been deposited, and no fair market material showed the payment to be excessive; the related-party disallowance was deleted. Interest on vehicle loans was also allowed as business expenditure because the loans related to vehicles acquired in earlier years, part-year interest had been claimed previously, and the current-year increase reflected full-year interest on outstanding borrowings rather than fresh purchases; that disallowance was deleted.
Consultancy charges paid to a sister concern were treated as genuine business expenditure because the agreements defined the work, supporting bills were on record, TDS and service tax had been deposited, and no fair market material showed the payment to be excessive; the related-party disallowance was deleted. Interest on vehicle loans was also allowed as business expenditure because the loans related to vehicles acquired in earlier years, part-year interest had been claimed previously, and the current-year increase reflected full-year interest on outstanding borrowings rather than fresh purchases; that disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.